{"id":6,"date":"2005-05-20T13:45:27","date_gmt":"2005-05-20T19:45:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/?p=6"},"modified":"2006-03-05T13:50:35","modified_gmt":"2006-03-05T19:50:35","slug":"stuff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/stuff\/","title":{"rendered":"Irregular Verbs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Are you writing me a love letter?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I stopped typing the email that I was working on and looked up at my wife.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Um, no.  I was replying to an email from Mom about using robot swarms as soldiers.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, my wife knows me well enough that there is a high likelihood that I am serious when I said that.  I was.  I am a wise-ass too, but robot swarms wouldn&#8217;t be the punch line to one of my gags. (Robot swarms are very serious.)<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You guys are definately different.  And you are all the same.&#8221;  Interesting statement.  I disagreed, although I have picked up enough at this point to recognize 1) what she means by same, 2) what I mean by same, and 3) we look at the &#8220;same&#8221; thing differently.  <\/p>\n<p>What I immediately thought was something along the lines of: well, we are different heights, hair color, and even genders.  The similarities in things like gait and facial structure are small enough that I have heard comments about others thinking we weren&#8217;t siblings at first.  The tastes in subject matter are way different.  Nope, not the same.<\/p>\n<p>What she meant was that we all have a wide net in what interests us, a very analytical outlook, and extremely curious natures.  If we come across something that doesn&#8217;t fall in the natural category of &#8220;oh, I am so into that,&#8221; we will still pay attention and ask questions.  In that case, same.<\/p>\n<p>Which I have to agree with.  I would put the term as &#8220;similar&#8221; not &#8220;same.&#8221;  Clones, no.  Intellectual comrades-in-arms, yes.<\/p>\n<p>Later, I was installing a RSS aggregator on my PC.  I should have done this a while ago. The list of blogs and news items that I try to keep up with is well beyond the point of being able to have a few bookmarks that I check up on.  Right away I was able to put most of the sites into the aggregator.  And away I went.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, now that I am moving these sites of interest into the aggregator, I have a chance to see a totality of my interests, albiet a totality of my blog interests.  (Newsletters and the like are not included in the aggregator as I get them via email.)  So I can see what interests me from a different perspective.  After all, when things come in a trickle, it is hard to estimate the whole population.  And if I am just poking around to one or two places at time that I can think of off the top of my head, that doesn&#8217;t capture the summation of all the sites that I have thought &#8220;hmm, have to check this out again.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So what interests me?  Jewish themed blogs are far and away the biggest area.  The individual focus might roam a bit over the idealogical map; some are observant, some not, and some are in between.  It is interesting to get a feel for different parts of The Tribe.<\/p>\n<p>Technology is another area.  Well, that figures.  I am a technically oriented person and do so love the science.  Or most of it.  I really don&#8217;t have the patience for, say, sociology unless it&#8217;s framed in terms of Complexity and Emergence.  As opposed to my sister, who is a sociologist, which supports my take on the above thinking of &#8220;not same.&#8221;  (There&#8217;s the gender difference too, but we&#8217;ll ignore that as a &#8220;duh.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>One thing that did pique my curiousity is the number of blogs about language.  Which might seem odd at first, since I am the first to admit that I have a limited grasp of English.  Oh, I can speak it.  I know what the individual words and ideas mean.  If the grammer is wrong, I &#8220;know&#8221; it only because it sounds wrong, not that I can point out &#8220;that thingy can&#8217;t follow the whoisit since the something is over there.&#8221;  But I have never quite fully understood it.  Frankly, it baffles the hell out of me.<\/p>\n<p>This has always been the case with me.  Spelling as a child was a nightmare.  Basically, brute force and rote recitation were what I used to make it far enough through school for spell checkers to be invented.  Although, by then I had graduated into college, but still.<\/p>\n<p>Now, since I don&#8217;t &#8220;get it,&#8221; but I use it daily to communicate, how is it that I understand anything?  Obviously, the letters in certain combinations are meaningful, but what makes that so?  How is it that we are able to convey information with these combinations in such a way that they are, for the most part, always understandable?  And why is it that I can&#8217;t see the rules that are in play?<\/p>\n<p>An example: Poems are collections of words.  Haiku is short enough for my discussion and cool enough to have a definition of how long it can be.  So, in theory, I can write a program to make a haiku.  <\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s say we make a list of words and say to the computer &#8220;pick a random 5 syllables, then another random 7, then another random 5.&#8221;  Poof! Instant haiku, right?  No, we get things like &#8220;Behavior Green Was \/ Dispensing Crash Consider \/ Column Feircely Has.&#8221;  Crap.  We can tweek it a little to make something like &#8220;Green Ideas Sleep Furiously,&#8221; but the point is syntax matters to make the ideas presentable.  And the &#8220;rules&#8221; of syntax baffle me.  <\/p>\n<p>So language for me is a puzzle, an intellectual challenge, and one that I relate back to information science a lot.  Even though I have a hard time with it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Are you writing me a love letter?&#8221; I stopped typing the email that I was working on and looked up at my wife. &#8220;Um, no. I was replying to an email from Mom about using robot swarms as soldiers.&#8221; Now, my wife knows me well enough that there is a high likelihood that I am [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-random-noise"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitytestsite.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}